arXiv AI

A Multi-Dataset Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Agents in Microservice Failure Diagnosis

arXiv:2606. 29193v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based agents are reshaping microservice operations into AgentOps, where benchmarks are key to evaluating failure diagnosis over multimodal observability data.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 15

How Far Can Root Cause Analysis Go on Real-World Telemetry Data?

Identifying root causes in production microservice failures requires reasoning over large-scale, multimodal telemetry spanning metrics, logs, and traces, a problem that has proved resistant to both classical and LLM-based approaches. The OpenRCA dataset exemplifies these challenges: it is large-scale, multimodal, and lacks detailed domain knowledge, and yields consistently low accuracy across all existing methods.

arXiv AI
Aug 18

When Agentic Executions Fail: Detecting and Localizing Runtime Faults from Telemetry

arXiv:2608. 14680v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliability in LLM-based agentic systems is a property of the whole execution (its tool calls, model calls, guardrails, and inter-agent messages), not of the final answer alone, yet evaluating only task outcomes reveals little about how or why a run fails.

By Chenkai Zhang, Yiran Li, Yifang Tian, Michalis Bachras, Hans-Arno Jacobsen
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 27

FaulT-Bench: Towards Benchmarking Network Troubleshooting LLM Agents under Unreliable User Tickets

FaulT-Bench is a new benchmark comprising 200 network troubleshooting scenarios across eight topologies, designed to test large‑language‑model agents on realistic, noisy tickets that may contain false premises or incorrect fault claims. The benchmark includes 72 rewritten tickets that vary reporter confidence and detail, and evaluates agents via an automated harness that scores diagnoses on outcome, fix, and reasoning quality. Results show that while agents perform well on accurate tickets, they degrade sharply on healthy networks with misleading reports, highlighting the importance of ticket wording over content.

arXiv AI
Aug 28

FaulT-Bench: Towards Benchmarking Network Troubleshooting LLM Agents under Unreliable User Tickets

FaulT-Bench is a new benchmark comprising 200 network troubleshooting scenarios across eight topologies, designed to test large‑language‑model agents on realistic, noisy user tickets that may contain false premises or incorrect fault claims. The benchmark includes 72 rewritten tickets that vary reporter confidence and detail while keeping the network state constant, allowing isolation of the impact of ticket wording on diagnosis. Evaluation of agents such as SADE, ReAct, and Claude Code shows they perform well on accurate tickets but degrade sharply on misleading or healthy‑network tickets, revealing differing failure modes and highlighting the importance of robust reasoning over unreliable input.

By Kuan-Hao Tseng, Niruth Bogahawatta, Yasod Ginige, Kunjan Patel, Kosta Dakic, Suranga Seneviratne
arXiv AI
2d ago

Incident-Arena: Getting agents to the last nine of reliability

Incident‑Arena is a new benchmark for AI coding agents focused on production incident response, featuring 20 tasks derived from real‑world open‑source software. Each task deploys a production application on an ephemerally created Kubernetes cluster, injects faults at various layers, and applies a sustained load profile. The benchmark introduces functional verifiers that maintain system‑level metrics while ensuring safe repairs, and shows that current frontier models achieve below 64.3% across the tasks, highlighting challenges in diagnosis, repair, and regression safety.

By Andre Fu, Malik Drabla, Leon Liu, Meji Abidoye, Marek Suppa, Lata Mishra, Adnan El Assadi, Yiyuan Li
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 13

OpsMem: Dual-Memory Reasoning with Cross-Memory Resonance for Failure Diagnosis

Failure diagnosis in modern software systems requires iterative evidence acquisition and hypothesis reasoning guided by operational experience. Existing LLM-based methods improve diagnosis through agentic reasoning or knowledge augmentation, but they often lack a mechanism to coordinate the evolving diagnostic state with operational experience during iterative diagnosis.