Most RAG Hallucinations Are Retrieval Failures: Fix Retrieval, Not the Prompt
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #7quinquies] - Hallucination is usually garbage-in.
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #7quinquies] - Hallucination is usually garbage-in.
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #7quinquies] - Hallucination is usually garbage-in.
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #8ter] - Naming the RAG error correctly matters: model reads the context, so a wrong answer is an extraction error, not a hallucination.
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #4bis] - A coauthor note on the brick-by-brick pitfalls that justified the four-brick split, before Part II walks the fixes The post 10 Common RAG Mistakes We Keep Seeing in Production appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #7ter] - Six positions on the retrieval brick that contradict the cosine-first reflex of mainstream RAG The post The Untaught Lessons of RAG Retrieval: Cosine Is Not the Foundation appeared first on Towards Data Science .
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #9bis] - Your RAG isn’t hallucinating, it’s answering the wrong context faithfully.
arXiv:2606. 06748v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) reduces but does not eliminate hallucination in large language models.
The best AI models still hallucinate. These hallucinations are sometimes funny, and sometimes cause actual damage.
arXiv:2608.29307v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Language models increasingly answer questions by consulting retrieved documents rather than memory alone, a design now common in search assistants an...
arXiv:2512. 21577v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite numerous attempts at mitigation since the inception of language models, hallucinations remain a persistent problem even in today's frontier LLMs.
The article discusses the importance of a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system providing clear evidence when it states that information is not present in a document. It outlines four distinct types of evidence that should accompany such a claim to avoid presenting a confident but incorrect answer or an unsupported “no answer.” The piece emphasizes that each evidence type serves as a safeguard against misinformation in enterprise document intelligence.
The article argues that Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is only one tool in NLP, and many real-world problems—such as request classification, free‑text matching, table reading, and OCR noise cleaning—are better served by simpler, cheaper techniques. It emphasizes the importance of selecting the appropriate method for each task and highlights the engineering challenge of knowing which technique to apply.
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol. 1 #9B] - One call wires the four upgraded bricks together, run on a paper, a NIST standard, and a report with a broken TOC The post A Production RAG Pipeline in Action: Every Answer Typed and Cited appeared first on Towards Data Science .